As is usual with the release of a new version of Fedora, it’s time to reflect on the stats revolving around what it took to get the latest-and-greatest out the door. With the recent push of F24, the numbers are in, so without further delay, let’s check ’em out!
Updates Testing
Wow, was there a lot of contribution to the Alpha release! 1,324 testers and 2,049 comments! That’s 1,269 more testers and 1,914 more comments than Fedora 23 Alpha. Great job! Below you’ll find the stats on who did what in Bodhi.
Test period: Fedora 24 Alpha (2016-02-23 – 2016-03-29)
Testers: 1324
Comments: 2049
Validation Testing
Below you’ll find the stats on validation testing as it was done throughout the Alpha release. Compared to Fedora 23 Alpha, there were 17 more testers and 385 more test reports! If that’s not proof that Fedora is growing, I don’t know what is!
Test period: Fedora 24 Alpha (2016-02-23 – 2016-03-29)
Testers: 24
Reports: 516
Unique referenced bugs: 41
Name | Reports submitted | Referenced bugs1 |
---|---|---|
pwhalen | 122 | 1160891 1314092 (2) |
juliuxpigface | 99 | 1160891 1223537 1230432 1276251 1299088 1303357 1306144 1313085 1314658 1315434 1315541 1316311 1316717 1316744 1317709 1318045 1318615 1319043 1319506 1319516 1320328 1320861 1320862 (23) |
kparal | 44 | |
satellit | 41 | 1276251 1288850 1310542 1315541 1318039 1318599 1320279 1321011 (8) |
pschindl | 30 | 1307633 1317721 1318615 (3) |
lnie | 28 | |
jdulaney | 23 | 1317960 (1) |
cmurf | 23 | 1290255 1318470 1318494 (3) |
nonamedotc | 19 | |
sgallagh | 18 | 1318303 (1) |
adamwill | 13 | 1288850 1316514 1317721 1320396 (4) |
kushal | 10 | |
akshays | 8 | |
lbrabec | 7 | 1318651 (1) |
jsedlak | 6 | |
dustymabe | 5 | |
robatino | 5 | |
gholms | 5 | |
barbosap | 3 | |
satya4ever | 2 | |
pgrunt | 2 | |
jreiser | 1 | 1319408 (1) |
cpanceac | 1 | |
coconut | 1 |
1 This is a list of bug reports referenced in test results. The bug itself may not be created by the same person.
Bug Reports
Here are some stats on the bugs that were reported over the course of the F24 Alpha release. We had 19 more bug reporters and 110 more bugs reported over the course of Fedora 24 Alpha.
Test period: Fedora 24 Alpha (2016-02-23 – 2016-03-29)
Reporters: 148
New reports: 427
Name | Reports submitted1 | Excess reports2 | Accepted blockers3 |
---|---|---|---|
Joachim Frieben | 29 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Giulio ‘juliuxpigface’ | 19 | 2 (10%) | 0 |
Christian Stadelmann | 18 | 1 (5%) | 0 |
Chris Murphy | 17 | 3 (17%) | 0 |
Adam Williamson | 16 | 0 (0%) | 4 |
Heiko Adams | 14 | 1 (7%) | 0 |
Jan Synacek | 12 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Dan Horák | 10 | 1 (10%) | 0 |
Randy Barlow | 10 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Lukas Slebodnik | 8 | 1 (12%) | 0 |
Mikhail | 8 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
jibecfed | 7 | 1 (14%) | 0 |
lnie | 7 | 2 (28%) | 0 |
Bill Gianopoulos | 6 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Han Han | 6 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Parag Nemade | 6 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Stas Sergeev | 6 | 3 (50%) | 0 |
Andrew Cook | 5 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Daniel Mach | 5 | 1 (20%) | 0 |
Fabio Valentini | 5 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Jan Sedlák | 5 | 2 (40%) | 0 |
Karl-Heinz Hoetzel | 5 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
mastaiza | 5 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Rex Dieter | 5 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Stephen Gallagher | 4 | 0 (0%) | 1 |
Andre Robatino | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Couret Charles-Antoine | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
John Dulaney | 4 | 1 (25%) | 0 |
Marius Vollmer | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Matteo Settenvini | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Mike FABIAN | 4 | 1 (25%) | 0 |
Ngo Than | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
William Moreno | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
A.J. Werkman | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Artem S. Tashkinov | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Carlos O’Donell | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Dennis Gilmore | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Jakub Dorňák | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Marek Skalický | 3 | 1 (33%) | 0 |
nvwarr at hotmail.com | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Paul Whalen | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Petr Schindler | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
pip at net.hr | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Stef Walter | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
…and also 104 other reporters who created less than 3 reports each, but 124 reports combined! |
1 The total number of new reports (including “excess reports”). Reopened reports or reports with a changed version are not included, because it was not technically easy to retrieve those. This is one of the reasons why you shouldn’t take the numbers too seriously, but just as interesting and fun data.
2 Excess reports are those that were closed as NOTABUG, WONTFIX, WORKSFORME, CANTFIX or INSUFFICIENT_DATA. Excess reports are not necessarily a bad thing, but they make for interesting statistics. Close manual inspection is required to separate valuable excess reports from those which are less valuable.
3 This only includes reports that were created by that particular user and accepted as blockers afterwards. The user might have proposed other people’s reports as blockers, but this is not reflected in this number.
Conclusion
The numbers don’t lie, Fedora is clearly growing! Thanks to all who supported the Fedora 24 Alpha testing effort, if it wasn’t for you, Fedora 24 wouldn’t have had the level of quality that it was released with!
Recent Comments