Let’s get right back into it with the Fedora 24 Beta release statistics regarding Bodhi updates, release-validation tests, and Bugzilla reports. The numbers don’t lie, keeping in favor with the idea that Fedora is growing!
Updates Testing
During the F24 Beta, as far as Bodhi updates go, there were 45 more testers and 289 more comments on updates than during the F23 Beta release.
Test period: Fedora 24 Beta (2016-03-29 – 2016-05-10)
Testers: 161
Comments1: 1398
1 If a person provides multiple comments to a single update, it is considered as a single comment. Karma value is not taken into account.
Validation Tests
Release testing brought more numbers too, with 9 more testers and 314 more test-reports than during the F23 Beta release.
Test period: Fedora 24 Beta (2016-03-29 – 2016-05-10)
Testers: 25
Reports: 906
Unique referenced bugs: 32
Name | Reports submitted | Referenced bugs1 |
---|---|---|
pwhalen | 255 | 1330298 (1) |
juliuxpigface | 150 | 1223537 1284293 1293167 1318045 1319459 1320307 1320328 1323110 1331091 1331107 1332026 (11) |
ahmadsamir | 115 | 1320273 1331382 (2) |
pschindl | 85 | 1259953 1330941 1331317 1331630 (4) |
kparal | 51 | 1330522 (1) |
lnie | 40 | |
sumantrom | 35 | |
satellit | 23 | 1177137 120917 (2) |
lbrabec | 18 | |
adamwill | 17 | 1259953 1330764 1330766 1330820 1332321 1332326 (6) |
jsedlak | 16 | 1314494 (1) |
coremodule | 15 | 1209017 (1) |
prakashmishra1598 | 12 | |
siddharthvipul1 | 12 | |
bollocks | 11 | 1319516 1332017 (2) |
fab | 10 | |
sumantro | 9 | |
me2 | 8 | 1336810 1337128 (2) |
cmurf | 6 | |
akash23 | 6 | |
achembar | 4 | |
h4xr | 3 | |
mindps | 2 | |
kevin | 2 | |
buvaneshkumar | 1 |
1 This is a list of bug reports referenced in test results. The bug itself may not be created by the same person.
Bug Reports
Finally, the stats around bug reports show that there were 44 more bug-reporters and 62 more bug reports.
Test period: Fedora 24 Beta (2016-03-29 – 2016-05-10)
Reporters: 293
New reports: 756
Name | Reports submitted1 | Excess reports2 | Accepted blockers3 |
---|---|---|---|
Christian Stadelmann | 55 | 3 (5%) | 0 |
Mikhail | 28 | 1 (3%) | 0 |
Mike FABIAN | 23 | 3 (13%) | 0 |
Adam Williamson | 17 | 1 (5%) | 1 |
Dan Horák | 17 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Chris Murphy | 13 | 1 (7%) | 0 |
jibecfed | 12 | 2 (16%) | 0 |
Joachim Frieben | 12 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
john smith | 12 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
lejeczek | 11 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Giulio ‘juliuxpigface’ | 9 | 2 (22%) | 0 |
lnie | 9 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Petr Schindler | 8 | 0 (0%) | 1 |
Andrey Motoshkov | 8 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Karsten Hopp | 8 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Sylvain Réault | 8 | 1 (12%) | 0 |
Nicolas Mailhot | 7 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Jan Stodola | 6 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Joachim Backes | 6 | 1 (16%) | 0 |
Kamil Páral | 6 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Alexander Kurtakov | 5 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Dennis Gilmore | 5 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
František Zatloukal | 5 | 2 (40%) | 0 |
Jan Sedlák | 5 | 2 (40%) | 0 |
Jan Včelák | 5 | 1 (20%) | 0 |
Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk | 5 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Noriko Mizumoto | 5 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
rosenp at gmail.com | 5 | 1 (20%) | 0 |
srakitnican | 5 | 2 (40%) | 0 |
Vedran Miletić | 5 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Yulia | 5 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Bill Gianopoulos | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
C.J.H. | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Chester Cheng | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Cole Robinson | 4 | 1 (25%) | 0 |
cornel panceac | 4 | 3 (75%) | 0 |
Dan Beard | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Daniel | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
David Le Sage | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
dertobi at emailn.de | 4 | 1 (25%) | 0 |
Florian Weimer | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Jonathan Briggs | 4 | 1 (25%) | 0 |
Karl-Heinz Hoetzel | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Ludovic Hirlimann | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Lukas Vrabec | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Menanteau Guy | 4 | 2 (50%) | 0 |
Pravin Satpute | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Randy Barlow | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Tuomas Kuosmanen | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Andrew Cook | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Biji | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
bob at bob131.so | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Dmitry Ryabtsev | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Dominic Cleal | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Dr. David Alan Gilbert | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Drew Meigs | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
dustin.j.berger at gmail.com | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Dusty Mabe | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Göran Uddeborg | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Ilya Gradina | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Kim Bisgaard | 3 | 1 (33%) | 0 |
Liu Song | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Maria Andrada | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
mastaiza | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Michael Young | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Mikko Tiihonen | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Ngo Than | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Orion Poplawski | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
PastorDi | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Przemek Klosowski | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Raphael Groner | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Rex Dieter | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
rvcsaba at freemail.hu | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Saurabh Pradhan | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Stephen Gallagher | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Zdenek Sedlak | 3 | 1 (33%) | 0 |
…and also 217 other reporters who created less than 3 reports each, but 273 reports combined! |
1 The total number of new reports (including “excess reports”). Reopened reports or reports with a changed version are not included, because it was not technically easy to retrieve those. This is one of the reasons why you shouldn’t take the numbers too seriously, but just as interesting and fun data.
2 Excess reports are those that were closed as NOTABUG, WONTFIX, WORKSFORME, CANTFIX or INSUFFICIENT_DATA. Excess reports are not necessarily a bad thing, but they make for interesting statistics. Close manual inspection is required to separate valuable excess reports from those which are less valuable.
3 This only includes reports that were created by that particular user and accepted as blockers afterwards. The user might have proposed other people’s reports as blockers, but this is not reflected in this number.
Conclusion
Once again, the numbers don’t lie, Fedora is clearly growing! The Alpha release showed a vast amount of growth over F23, and the Beta release stood behind that. Time to muster forth to see how the Final release of Fedora 24 performed!
Recent Comments