Hello fellow testers, welcome to the Fedora 31 Final installation of Heroes of Fedora! In this post, we’ll look at the stats concerning the testing of Fedora 31 Final. The purpose of Heroes of Fedora is to provide a summation of testing activity on each milestone release of Fedora. Without community support, Fedora would not exist, so thank you to all who contributed to this release! Without further ado, let’s get started!

Updates Testing

Test period: Fedora 31 Final (2019-10-08 – 2019-10-29)
Testers: 111
Comments1: 402

NameUpdates commented
atim45
Pete Walter (pwalter)36
František Zatloukal (frantisekz)25
Eugene Mah (imabug)24
Hans Müller (cairo)21
Peter Smith (smithp)16
Varshit Agarwal (agarwalvarshit)15
Martti Kuosmanen (kuosmanen)15
Adam Williamson (adamwill)12
Peter Robinson (pbrobinson)11
Markus Teuber (ibims)8
Alessio (alciregi)8
Chris Sandler (chr77)6
Paul Whalen (pwhalen)6
Kamil Páral (kparal)5
Vasiliy Glazov (vascom)5
Igor Gnatenko (ignatenkobrain)4
Sumantro Mukherjee (sumantrom)4
Stanislav Skipa (latesil)4
Michael Hrechyn (elxreno)4
Michel (micmor)4
bluepencil4
jvcelak3
p d (pizzadude)3
Miro Hrončok (churchyard)3
Parag Nemade (pnemade)3
Ankur Sinha (ankursinha)3
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart)3
…and also 83 other reporters who created less than 3 reports each, but 102 reports combined!

1 If a person provides multiple comments to a single update, it is considered as a single comment. Karma value is not taken into account.

Validation Testing

Test period: Fedora 31 Final (2019-10-08 – 2019-10-29)
Testers: 13
Reports: 431
Unique referenced bugs: 4

NameReports submittedReferenced bugs1
pwhalen931691430 (1)
frantisekz93
tablepc51
lruzicka471764712 (1)
kparal26
alciregi231764642 (1)
fab22
sgallagh19
lbrabec19
lnie16
adamwill91762751 (1)
satellit7
mohanboddu6

1 This is a list of bug reports referenced in test results. The bug itself may not be created by the same person.

Bug Reports

Test period: Fedora 31 Final (2019-10-08 – 2019-10-29)
Reporters: 209
New reports: 320

NameReports submitted1Excess reports2Accepted blockers3
xzj8b3110 (0%)0
alamar60 (0%)0
Lukas Ruzicka60 (0%)0
ricky.tigg at gmail.com60 (0%)0
dovla091 at gmail.com50 (0%)0
Gabriel Elyas50 (0%)0
Alessio43 (75%)1
Kamil Páral43 (75%)1
Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD)40 (0%)0
Craig Robson40 (0%)0
D. Hugh Redelmeier41 (25%)0
Jonathan Haas40 (0%)0
Luya Tshimbalanga40 (0%)0
pmkellly at frontier.com40 (0%)0
Artem S. Tashkinov30 (0%)0
Benedikt Schäfer30 (0%)0
Cetera30 (0%)0
Diego Marino30 (0%)0
Dima Ryazanov31 (33%)0
Peter Robinson30 (0%)0
Peter Simonyi30 (0%)0
Ramprasad G30 (0%)0
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek30 (0%)0
Adam Williamson20 (0%)1
Andre Klapper21 (50%)0
ant0nn at pm.me20 (0%)0
Artem20 (0%)0
djraymond1 at naver.com20 (0%)0
efreeti20 (0%)0
Elso Silva20 (0%)0
Florian Uhl20 (0%)0
Gwendal20 (0%)0
Honza Brázdil20 (0%)0
Joachim Backes21 (50%)0
Joel Diaz20 (0%)0
Juan Campos20 (0%)0
Juan Orti Alcaine20 (0%)0
Kevin Cameron20 (0%)0
Laurent Boualit20 (0%)0
Lucious20 (0%)0
Lukas Slebodnik20 (0%)0
Mai Ling20 (0%)0
Marek Greško20 (0%)0
Martin Pitt20 (0%)0
Martin Tessun20 (0%)0
Michael21 (50%)0
Michal Konecny21 (50%)0
Mikel Pérez20 (0%)0
Milan Zink21 (50%)0
NBnet20 (0%)0
nicolasoliver03 at gmail.com20 (0%)0
Nils Philippsen20 (0%)0
Ole Schönburg20 (0%)0
ozeszty20 (0%)0
Paulo Paim20 (0%)0
robert at stanfield.it20 (0%)0
Saurav Sengupta20 (0%)0
Thomas Jenkins20 (0%)0
valera20 (0%)0
…and also 150 other reporters who created less than 2 reports each, but 150 reports combined!

1 The total number of new reports (including “excess reports”). Reopened reports or reports with a changed version are not included, because it was not technically easy to retrieve those. This is one of the reasons why you shouldn’t take the numbers too seriously, but just as interesting and fun data.
2 Excess reports are those that were closed as NOTABUG, WONTFIX, WORKSFORME, CANTFIX or INSUFFICIENT_DATA. Excess reports are not necessarily a bad thing, but they make for interesting statistics. Close manual inspection is required to separate valuable excess reports from those which are less valuable.
3 This only includes reports that were created by that particular user and accepted as blockers afterwards. The user might have proposed other people’s reports as blockers, but this is not reflected in this number.