Following on from the Alpha post, it’s time to celebrate all those who contributed to Fedora 23 Beta testing! As usual, we’ll be looking at Bodhi feedback on updates, release validation tests, and bug reports.
Updates Testing
Test period: Fedora 23 Beta (2015-08-11 – 2015-09-22)
Testers: 116
Comments1: 1109
1 If a person provides multiple comments to a single update, it is considered as a single comment. Karma value is not taken into account.
As usual the numbers here are much higher compared to Alpha, as Bodhi is enabled for the whole Beta cycle and more people are testing. Again the numbers are significantly down on Fedora 22; again this may be due to the upheaval caused by the switchover to Bodhi 2. We should definitely aim to bump up the numbers again for Fedora 24! Hans Müller and Chris Sandler deserve a special mention for being in the top 3 for both F22 Beta and F23 Beta.
Validation Tests
Test period: Fedora 23 Beta
Testers: 16
Reports: 592
Unique referenced bugs: 29
Name | Reports submitted | Referenced bugs1 |
---|---|---|
pwhalen | 111 | 1250737 1258013 1263570 (3) |
satellit | 105 | 1240147 1240354 1244442 1257898 1262599 (5) |
juliuxpigface | 98 | 1223537 1228834 1240879 1241241 1257637 1258992 1260261 1260262 1261464 1262484 1262533 1262534 1262599 1262600 1262602 (15) |
pschindl | 62 | 1250737 1263762 (2) |
roshi | 53 | 1250737 (1) |
lnie | 38 | 1262706 (1) |
lbrabec | 25 | 1263570 1263988 (2) |
robatino | 20 | |
adamwill | 19 | 1258690 (1) |
sgallagh | 17 | |
kparal | 15 | 1252902 1260989 1264012 (3) |
devo8604 | 8 | |
kakoskin | 8 | |
jsedlak | 7 | |
dustymabe | 5 | |
shaiton | 1 |
1 This is a list of bug reports referenced in test results. The bug itself may not be created by the same person.
Once again we see numbers higher than Alpha and lower than Fedora 22. Again I think the number of tests run by openQA is a significant influence here. satellit and pwhalen were the top two for Fedora 22 Beta and maintain that status here, with juliuxpigface joining them right up at the top.
Bug Reports
Test period: Fedora 23 Beta (2015-08-11 – 2015-09-22)
Reporters: 249
New reports: 694
Name | Reports submitted1 | Excess reports2 | Accepted blockers3 |
---|---|---|---|
Mikhail | 46 | 4 (8%) | 0 |
Karel Volný | 25 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Christian Stadelmann | 22 | 1 (4%) | 0 |
Adam Williamson | 18 | 2 (11%) | 4 |
Heiko Adams | 16 | 2 (12%) | 0 |
Ilya Gradina | 15 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Joachim Frieben | 15 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Stephen Gallagher | 11 | 2 (18%) | 0 |
Giulio ‘juliuxpigface’ | 10 | 0 (0%) | 1 |
Kamil Páral | 10 | 1 (10%) | 1 |
Diogo Campos | 10 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Mike FABIAN | 10 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Yonatan | 10 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Brion Vibber | 9 | 3 (33%) | 0 |
Joachim Backes | 9 | 1 (11%) | 0 |
Leslie Satenstein | 9 | 4 (44%) | 0 |
Peter Robinson | 9 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Daniel Mach | 8 | 1 (12%) | 0 |
A.J. Werkman | 7 | 1 (14%) | 0 |
Chris Murphy | 7 | 1 (14%) | 0 |
Jiri Popelka | 7 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Ronald L Humble | 7 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Parag Nemade | 6 | 2 (33%) | 0 |
Petr Lautrbach | 6 | 1 (16%) | 0 |
William Moreno | 6 | 2 (33%) | 0 |
Cole Robinson | 5 | 1 (20%) | 0 |
Dumindu | 5 | 2 (40%) | 0 |
Dusty Mabe | 5 | 1 (20%) | 0 |
Helio Chissini de Castro | 5 | 1 (20%) | 0 |
Jakub Čajka | 5 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
kakoskin at gmail.com | 5 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
lnie | 5 | 1 (20%) | 0 |
Lukas Brabec | 5 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Menanteau Guy | 5 | 2 (40%) | 0 |
ONURALP SEZER | 5 | 1 (20%) | 0 |
Paul Whalen | 5 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Tomas Hozza | 5 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Alexander Kurtakov | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
David Hill | 4 | 2 (50%) | 0 |
Edward O’Callaghan | 4 | 1 (25%) | 0 |
Göran Uddeborg | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
idviare | 4 | 1 (25%) | 0 |
joerg.lechner at aol.de | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Petr Schindler | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Richard S. Hendershot | 4 | 1 (25%) | 0 |
Severin Gehwolf | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Vadim Rutkovsky | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Piotr Drąg | 3 | 1 (33%) | 1 |
Alex Richert | 3 | 1 (33%) | 0 |
Andrew Peek | 3 | 2 (66%) | 0 |
Andrey Chessnokov | 3 | 1 (33%) | 0 |
Carlos “casep” Sepulveda | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Dan Horák | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
fujiwara | 3 | 1 (33%) | 0 |
icywind90 at gmail.com | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Itaru Kitayama | 3 | 1 (33%) | 0 |
Marcus Moeller | 3 | 2 (66%) | 0 |
Matej Habrnal | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Mike Simms | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Pravin Satpute | 3 | 1 (33%) | 0 |
Ralf Corsepius | 3 | 1 (33%) | 0 |
Raphael Groner | 3 | 1 (33%) | 0 |
Rex Dieter | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Rodd Clarkson | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
satellitgo at gmail.com | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Szymon Janc | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Vaso VV | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Yaakov Selkowitz | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
Yu Watanabe | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
…and also 180 other reporters who created less than 3 reports each, but 220 reports combined! |
1 The total number of new reports (including “excess reports”). Reopened reports or reports with a changed version are not included, because it was not technically easy to retrieve those. This is one of the reasons why you shouldn’t take the numbers too seriously, but just as interesting and fun data.
2 Excess reports are those that were closed as NOTABUG, WONTFIX, WORKSFORME, CANTFIX or INSUFFICIENT_DATA. Excess reports are not necessarily a bad thing, but they make for interesting statistics. Close manual inspection is required to separate valuable excess reports from those which are less valuable.
3 This only includes reports that were created by that particular user and accepted as blockers afterwards. The user might have proposed other people’s reports as blockers, but this is not reflected in this number.
Once again we see a similar trend, with the numbers somewhat down on Fedora 22. Mikhail Gavrilov wins the race for quantity once more, while I managed to sneak in and take the crown for accepted blockers.
Conclusion
Overall the numbers continue to show a trend of dropping compared to Fedora 22 – though we can draw some different conclusions from this. We still have many heroes to thank, however, and it’s great to see all the tables with a strong showing from the community. Long-time MVPs satellit and juliuxpigface make a strong showing again, with dozens of other folks helping out in one or more of the areas we looked at. Thanks to all the heroes who appear above, we couldn’t make Fedora without you!
March 13, 2016 — 03:37
Thank for for providing this listing. It is encouraging to see that we are diehard Fedora champions.
I look forward to the F24 beta iso (or earlier iso), and will dig in and verify that my needs are fully implemented.
March 15, 2016 — 14:26
Thanks for your awesome help in making Fedora what it is, Leslie!