Today’s post concerns Fedora 25 Final!
Welcome to the final Heroes of Fedora post concerning Fedora 25! The purpose of this post is to share the results of who-did-what in Fedora testing for the Fedora 25 Final release. Below you’ll find stats on Bodhi updates, nightly validation testing, and Bugzilla reports. Let’s get started!
Updates Testing
For the Fedora 25 Final release cycle, there were 43 less testers and 489 less comments than the Fedora 24 Final release.
Test period: Fedora 25 Final (2016-10-11 – 2016-11-22)
Testers: 163
Comments1: 1211
1 If a person provides multiple comments to a single update, it is considered as a single comment. Karma value is not taken into account.
Validation Testing
As far as nightly validation testing is concerned, compared to Fedora 24 Final, there were 5 less testers, 75 more test-reports, and 9 more unique bugs.
Test period: Fedora 25 Final (2016-10-11 – 2016-11-22)
Testers: 22
Reports: 793
Unique referenced bugs: 29
| Name | Reports submitted | Referenced bugs1 |
|---|---|---|
| pwhalen | 248 | |
| juliuxpigface | 162 | 1261464 1268622 1320328 1366897 1375160 1376471 1381137 1382820 1383471 1385160 1385399 1392159 (12) |
| lbrabec | 67 | |
| pschindl | 59 | |
| kparal | 56 | 1347291 1393846 (2) |
| satellit | 51 | 1363915 1394449 (2) |
| jsedlak | 25 | 1375160 (1) |
| tenk | 25 | 1375745 1386640 (2) |
| lnie | 24 | 1370412 1370412,1396352,1393638 1379561 1386059 1393638 1393765 1395580 1395620 (8) |
| sumantrom | 23 | |
| coremodule | 13 | 1378297 1388643 (2) |
| kevin | 10 | |
| sgallagh | 6 | |
| kushal | 5 | |
| fab | 5 | |
| siddharthvipul1 | 4 | |
| prakashmishra1598 | 3 | |
| adamwill | 2 | |
| z1pp | 2 | |
| 64bit pv fedora 25 server images. | 1 | |
| 32-bit pv (fedora server 25) fails to boot | 1 | |
| mahmudulhaque | 1 |
1 This is a list of bug reports referenced in test results. The bug itself may not be created by the same person.
Bug Reports
Compared to Fedora 24 Final, there were 13 more bug reporters, and 138 more bug reports.
Test period: Fedora 25 Final – (2016-10-11 – 2016-11-22)
Reporters: 421
New reports: 999
| Name | Reports submitted1 | Excess reports2 | Accepted blockers3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| lnie | 63 | 2 (3%) | 0 |
| RJ | 23 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Christian Stadelmann | 21 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Giulio ‘juliuxpigface’ | 20 | 1 (5%) | 0 |
| Mikhail | 16 | 2 (12%) | 0 |
| Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek | 16 | 1 (6%) | 0 |
| Diogo Campos | 15 | 5 (33%) | 0 |
| Hedayat Vatankhah | 15 | 1 (6%) | 0 |
| Joachim Frieben | 15 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Kamil Páral | 14 | 0 (0%) | 2 |
| Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) | 12 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Juan Orti | 11 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Anass Ahmed | 10 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| dimapunk80 at yandex.ru | 10 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Adam Williamson | 9 | 1 (11%) | 3 |
| Gwendal | 9 | 1 (11%) | 0 |
| Łukasz Faber | 9 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| George R. Goffe | 8 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Sam Tygier | 8 | 1 (12%) | 0 |
| F.J. Simon | 7 | 1 (14%) | 0 |
| lennart_reuther at web.de | 7 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| mastaiza | 7 | 1 (14%) | 0 |
| pzeppegno at gmail.com | 7 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Hans de Goede | 6 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Jeremy Linton | 6 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Jussi Eloranta | 6 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Ralph Giles | 6 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Wolfgang Rupprecht | 6 | 1 (16%) | 0 |
| Yaniv Kaul | 6 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Alexander Ploumistos | 5 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Berend De Schouwer | 5 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Bojan Smojver | 5 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Eduardo Silva | 5 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| hx at inbox.lv | 5 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| lejeczek | 5 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| madstitz at gmail.com | 5 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Mikko Tiihonen | 5 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Mustafa Muhammad | 5 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Neal Gompa | 5 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Paul Whalen | 5 | 4 (80%) | 0 |
| Pavel Alexeev | 5 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Petr Schindler | 5 | 2 (40%) | 0 |
| yucef sourani | 5 | 2 (40%) | 0 |
| Jiri Eischmann | 4 | 0 (0%) | 1 |
| Stephen Gallagher | 4 | 0 (0%) | 1 |
| bram.schellen at gmail.com | 4 | 1 (25%) | 0 |
| c.steinseifer at mailbox.org | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Colin Walters | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Daniel Berrange | 4 | 1 (25%) | 0 |
| Dominik ‘Rathann’ Mierzejewski | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Dusty Mabe | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Joachim Backes | 4 | 1 (25%) | 0 |
| Mohammed Sadiq | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Nerijus Baliūnas | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Robert de Rooy | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| snaggen at gmail.com | 4 | 1 (25%) | 0 |
| tenk at fedoraproject.org | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Terje Røsten | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Yonatan | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| …and also 362 other reporters who created less than 4 reports each, but 497 reports combined! | |||
1 The total number of new reports (including “excess reports”). Reopened reports or reports with a changed version are not included, because it was not technically easy to retrieve those. This is one of the reasons why you shouldn’t take the numbers too seriously, but just as interesting and fun data.
2 Excess reports are those that were closed as NOTABUG, WONTFIX, WORKSFORME, CANTFIX or INSUFFICIENT_DATA. Excess reports are not necessarily a bad thing, but they make for interesting statistics. Close manual inspection is required to separate valuable excess reports from those which are less valuable.
3 This only includes reports that were created by that particular user and accepted as blockers afterwards. The user might have proposed other people’s reports as blockers, but this is not reflected in this number.
Conclusion
Once again, it’s time to thank everyone who made Fedora 25 happen! To all the testers, code-monkeys, late-night installers, scripters, executors, terminal-tamers, keyboard-ninjas, and anyone else who helped with the testing of Fedora 25, thank you. Fedora wouldn’t be the OS it is without you and your efforts making sure the quality is what it’s supposed to be. With Fedora 25 having been released, we have the next release of Fedora to look forward to, and with that, the next edition of Heroes of Fedora! See you then.
Start the discussion by commenting on the auto-created topic at discussion.fedoraproject.org