It’s time for some stats concerning Fedora 28 Beta!
Welcome back to another installation of Heroes of Fedora, where we’ll look at the stats concerning the testing of Fedora 28 Beta. The purpose of Heroes of Fedora is to provide a summation of testing activity on each milestone release of Fedora. So, without further ado, let’s get started!
Updates Testing
Test period: Fedora 28 Beta (2018-03-06 – 2018-04-17)
Testers: 166
Comments1: 1467
1 If a person provides multiple comments to a single update, it is considered as a single comment. Karma value is not taken into account.
Validation Testing
Test period: Fedora 28 Beta (2018-03-06 – 2018-04-17)
Testers: 23
Reports: 991
Unique referenced bugs: 35
| Name | Reports submitted | Referenced bugs1 |
|---|---|---|
| pwhalen | 367 | 1520580 1553488 1565217 1566593 (4) |
| lruzicka | 170 | 1558027 1566566 1569411 on bare metal (4) |
| alciregi | 108 | 1520580 1536356 1541868 1552130 1553935 1554072 1554075 1556951 1557472 1561072 1564784 1568119 (12) |
| tablepc | 56 | 1560314 (1) |
| lnie | 51 | 1557655 1557659 (2) |
| coremodule | 34 | |
| satellit | 23 | 1519042 1533310 1554996 1558671 1561304 (5) |
| lbrabec | 22 | |
| tenk | 20 | 1539499 1561304 1562024 (3) |
| sumantrom | 20 | |
| kparal | 18 | 1555752 1557472 1560738 1562087 (4) |
| frantisekz | 17 | 1561115 (1) |
| sgallagh | 15 | |
| table1pc | 15 | |
| adamwill | 12 | 1560738 1561768 (2) |
| sinnykumari | 10 | |
| fab | 7 | |
| siddharthvipul1 | 6 | |
| pschindl | 6 | |
| kevin | 5 | |
| jdoss | 4 | |
| mohanboddu | 4 | |
| hobbes1069 | 1 | 1561284 (1) |
1 This is a list of bug reports referenced in test results. The bug itself may not be created by the same person.
Bug Reports
Test period: Fedora 28 Beta (2018-03-06 – 2018-04-17)
Reporters: 320
New reports: 1918
| Name | Reports submitted1 | Excess reports2 | Accepted blockers3 |
|---|---|---|---|
| Fedora Release Engineering | 1104 | 47 (4%) | 0 |
| Lukas Ruzicka | 31 | 6 (19%) | 2 |
| lnie | 30 | 9 (30%) | 0 |
| Adam Williamson | 25 | 0 (0%) | 7 |
| Alessio | 22 | 8 (36%) | 0 |
| Chris Murphy | 18 | 1 (5%) | 0 |
| Heiko Adams | 16 | 2 (12%) | 0 |
| Florian Weimer | 12 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| mastaiza | 12 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| ricky.tigg at gmail.com | 11 | 3 (27%) | 0 |
| Juan Orti | 10 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Menanteau Guy | 10 | 6 (60%) | 0 |
| Christian Heimes | 9 | 1 (11%) | 0 |
| Daniel Mach | 9 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Stephen Gallagher | 8 | 0 (0%) | 1 |
| Hayden | 8 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Jared Smith | 8 | 1 (12%) | 0 |
| Joseph | 8 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| pmkellly at frontier.com | 8 | 1 (12%) | 0 |
| René Genz | 8 | 1 (12%) | 0 |
| Paul Whalen | 7 | 0 (0%) | 1 |
| Anass Ahmed | 7 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| František Zatloukal | 7 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Hedayat Vatankhah | 7 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Leslie Satenstein | 7 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Miro Hrončok | 7 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Randy Barlow | 7 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| shirokuro005 at gmail.com | 7 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Andrey Motoshkov | 6 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) | 6 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| J. Haas | 6 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Jens Petersen | 6 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| John Reiser | 6 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Langdon White | 6 | 1 (16%) | 0 |
| Martin Pitt | 6 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Merlin Mathesius | 6 | 1 (16%) | 0 |
| Mikhail | 6 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Stephen | 6 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek | 6 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Kamil Páral | 5 | 1 (20%) | 1 |
| Ali Akcaagac | 5 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Parag Nemade | 5 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Peter Robinson | 5 | 2 (40%) | 0 |
| sumantro | 5 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Christian Kellner | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| dac.override at gmail.com | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Dawid Zamirski | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Jiri Eischmann | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| John Dennis | 4 | 1 (25%) | 0 |
| Kalev Lember | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Milan Zink | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Miroslav Suchý | 4 | 1 (25%) | 0 |
| Petr Pisar | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| satellitgo at gmail.com | 4 | 1 (25%) | 0 |
| sedrubal | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Steven Haigh | 4 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Dusty Mabe | 3 | 0 (0%) | 1 |
| Bhushan Barve | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Daniel Rindt | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| deadrat | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Gwendal | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Henrique Montemor Junqueira | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Joachim Frieben | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| luke_l at o2.pl | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Matías Zúñiga | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Michel Normand | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Mike FABIAN | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Mirek Svoboda | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Nathanael Noblet | 3 | 1 (33%) | 0 |
| Quentin Tayssier | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| sebby2k | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Vadim | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Vadim Raskhozhev | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Vladimir Benes | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Yaakov Selkowitz | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| yucef sourani | 3 | 0 (0%) | 0 |
| Zdenek Chmelar | 3 | 1 (33%) | 0 |
| …and also 243 other reporters who created less than 3 reports each, but 293 reports combined! | |||
1 The total number of new reports (including “excess reports”). Reopened reports or reports with a changed version are not included, because it was not technically easy to retrieve those. This is one of the reasons why you shouldn’t take the numbers too seriously, but just as interesting and fun data.
2 Excess reports are those that were closed as NOTABUG, WONTFIX, WORKSFORME, CANTFIX or INSUFFICIENT_DATA. Excess reports are not necessarily a bad thing, but they make for interesting statistics. Close manual inspection is required to separate valuable excess reports from those which are less valuable.
3 This only includes reports that were created by that particular user and accepted as blockers afterwards. The user might have proposed other people’s reports as blockers, but this is not reflected in this number.
Recent Comments