Hello everyone, welcome to the Fedora 29 Final installation of Heroes of Fedora! In this post, we’ll look at the stats concerning the testing of Fedora 29 Final. The purpose of Heroes of Fedora is to provide a summation of testing activity on each milestone release of Fedora. So, without further ado, let’s get started!

 

Updates Testing

Test period: Fedora 29 Final (2018-10-09 – 2018-10-30)
Testers: 139
Comments1: 641

Name Updates commented
Björn Esser (besser82) 78
Dmitri Smirnov (cserpentis) 74
Filipe Rosset (filiperosset) 48
Firas Dieter Nuwayhid (nomos) 29
Davis Alvarez (davisclick) 25
Pete Walter (pwalter) 23
Nie Lili (lnie) 18
Hans Müller (cairo) 16
Martti Kuosmanen (kuosmanen) 14
Peter Robinson (pbrobinson) 13
Chris Sandler (chr77) 13
František Zatloukal (frantisekz) 13
Kamil Páral (kparal) 13
mattf 12
Charles-Antoine Couret (renault) 12
Lukáš Růžička (lruzicka) 12
bojan 11
Peter Smith (smithp) 7
Julen Landa Alustiza (jlanda) 7
Mohan Boddu (mohanboddu) 6
Adam Williamson (adamwill) 6
anonymous 5
Daniel Lara Souza (danniel) 5
Vitaly Zaitsev (xvitaly) 5
Luis Enrique Bazán De León (lbazan) 5
Kevin Fenzi (kevin) 5
Lukas Brabec (lbrabec) 4
Sumantro Mukherjee (sumantrom) 4
shecks 4
asciiwolf 4
Alberto Rodriguez Sanchez (bt0dotninja) 4
Geoffrey Marr (coremodule) 4
nucleo 4
Randy Barlow (bowlofeggs) 3
Basti Endres (sedrubal) 3
Piotr Drąg (piotrdrag) 3
Dusty Mabe (dustymabe) 3
Nicolas Chauvet (kwizart) 3
José Abílio Oliveira Matos (jamatos) 3
atim 3
Matej Marusak (mmarusak) 3
…and also 98 other reporters who created less than 3 reports each, but 114 reports combined!

 

1 If a person provides multiple comments to a single update, it is considered as a single comment. Karma value is not taken into account.

Validation Testing

Test period: Fedora 29 Final (2018-10-09 – 2018-10-30)
Testers: 7
Reports: 115
Unique referenced bugs: 1

Name Reports submitted Referenced bugs1
pwhalen 55  
lruzicka 45 1628495 (1)
lnie 7  
alciregi 5  
satellit 1  
jbwillia 1  
frantisekz 1  

 

1 This is a list of bug reports referenced in test results. The bug itself may not be created by the same person.

 

Bug Reports

Test period: Fedora 29 Final (2018-10-09 – 2018-10-30)
Reporters: 248
New reports: 410

Name Reports submitted1 Excess reports2 Accepted blockers3
Bilal 15 1 (6%) 0
xzj8b3 12 3 (25%) 0
Shecks 10 1 (10%) 0
Héctor Louzao 7 2 (28%) 0
Juan Orti 7 2 (28%) 0
Kamil Páral 7 0 (0%) 0
ricky.tigg at gmail.com 7 4 (57%) 0
Stephen Gallagher 6 0 (0%) 1
cornosier at palendriai.lt 5 1 (20%) 0
Matt Fagnani 5 0 (0%) 0
Nerijus Baliūnas 5 0 (0%) 0
Chris Murphy 4 0 (0%) 0
Daniel Rusek 4 2 (50%) 0
Jonas Ådahl 4 0 (0%) 0
Mai Ling 4 0 (0%) 0
Niki Guldbrand 4 0 (0%) 0
Nils Philippsen 4 0 (0%) 0
RudraB 4 0 (0%) 0
Villy Kruse 4 0 (0%) 0
Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek 4 0 (0%) 0
Tomas Popela 3 0 (0%) 1
Benjamin Berg 3 0 (0%) 0
Dusty Mabe 3 0 (0%) 0
Fabio Valentini 3 1 (33%) 0
František Zatloukal 3 0 (0%) 0
François Perriot 3 0 (0%) 0
Jason Montleon 3 0 (0%) 0
Julius B. 3 0 (0%) 0
Lukas Ruzicka 3 2 (66%) 0
Michael Catanzaro 3 0 (0%) 0
Philip Kovacs 3 0 (0%) 0
Sulthan 3 0 (0%) 0
udo 3 1 (33%) 0
…and also 215 other reporters who created less than 3 reports each, but 249 reports combined!

 

1 The total number of new reports (including “excess reports”). Reopened reports or reports with a changed version are not included, because it was not technically easy to retrieve those. This is one of the reasons why you shouldn’t take the numbers too seriously, but just as interesting and fun data.
2 Excess reports are those that were closed as NOTABUG, WONTFIX, WORKSFORME, CANTFIX or INSUFFICIENT_DATA. Excess reports are not necessarily a bad thing, but they make for interesting statistics. Close manual inspection is required to separate valuable excess reports from those which are less valuable.
3 This only includes reports that were created by that particular user and accepted as blockers afterwards. The user might have proposed other people’s reports as blockers, but this is not reflected in this number.